Tuesday, December 2, 2008
Brian K. Murphy
..."Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP), one of the supposedly rare diseases that most
definitively marked the onset of AIDS in North America, is neither new nor so very rare.
Identified in 1911, vulnerability to PCP is related to, among other things, prolonged
Vitamin A deficiency in drug addicts and alcoholics, and has been commonly diagnosed
among the malnourished in the Global South, particularly among young children in
Africa and Asia suffering from Kwashiorkor. (Root-Bernstein pointedly asks, “Why do
we call a patient who dies of Pneumocystis pneumonia [independent of HIV] unfortunate,
but one who dies of Pneumocystis pneumonia and HIV an AIDS tragedy?”)..."
Thursday, November 6, 2008
Henry H. Bauer, Ph.D.
(Full Text Link)
Tuesday, November 4, 2008
Saturday, November 1, 2008
...Now the AIDS denialists abuse the peer-reviewed literature. They abuse science. They cite only old, long refuted papers as if they still represented state of the art knowledge, which they don’t. So they argue that TB, malaria, leprosy, pregnancy cause false positive tests in an HIV assay.."
Is the Oxidation Induced by the Risk Factors the Primary Cause?
Dr. Eleni Papadopulos- Biophysicist; Perth, Western Australia
(Full Text Link)
Thursday, October 30, 2008
(Full Text Link)
"Analysis of Causes That Led to Eliza Jane Scovill’s Cardiac Arrest and Death"
Wednesday, October 29, 2008
"The Brothers Flexner"
Nancy Turner Banks, MD[ Harvard ], MBA
(Full Text Link- click here)
AIDS is many things, but this is what you need to know:
- AIDS is not caused by a virus
- AIDS is not a death sentence
- AIDS is not a sexually transmitted disease
- AIDS tests are useless
- AIDS tests discriminate by race
- AIDS is not a blood borne disease
- AIDS has not become the predicted pandemic
- AIDS drugs cause AIDS
- AIDS is not killing
- Black women are the intended targets of the AIDS hoax
Antibodies and Immunity
The HIV antibody tests are another scientific conundrum never fully explained. An elevated antibody count has been historically used to identify those who have immunity to a disease. For example, after you receive a measles vaccine your anti-measles antibody count rises. This elevated count signifies your immunity from contracting that particular disease. This is the underling theory of vaccines. If your antibody count drops you are to said to need a booster shot for the specific purpose of raising your antibody levels, called titers. It is claimed that the vaccine will raise your immunity to the disease by increasing your antibodies against this pathogen. Yet in the case of HIV, when your antibody titers are already elevated indicating that your body is working normally and has developed an immunity to HIV you are said to not be immune and subject to the development of AIDS—a scientific wonder never explained by those promoting this theory. Yet the AIDS promoters are promising a vaccine against AIDS knowing that any vaccine would produce the exact antibodies, in which case people would be said to be immune from AIDS. If you are already confused, that seems to be the point of HIV “science”. Thus far, there has been no viable vaccine produced and it will be interesting to see just how long that little charade continues. (Note: it will continue as long as the money flows to this misguided research)
Rodney Richards, PhD., worked on the development of antibody (ELISA) and genetic “viral load” tests for Amgen and holds some related patents. “The diagnosis of being HIV positive is based on arbitrary combinations of tests, none of which are approved for diagnosing HIV…in fact there is no test for HIV. It’s just an illusion.”* (Worchester.IndyMedia.org, Verdict of $2.4 million Over False-Positive HIV Diagnosis Brings up Basic Problems with AIDS Testing and Treatment, Say Scientists, Dec. 12, 2007)